A new scheme to detect people who are obsessed with violence before they kill, such as the Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana, should be considered by the government, an official report will say.
Why? It'll merely prove to be as useless (and caputed by the 'welcome all refugees' crowd) as all the others....
The report into Prevent, the controversial programme intended to stop people from becoming terrorists, will also find repeated “failings” in the case of the man who went on to assassinate the MP Sir David Amess, the Guardian understands.
How surprising, eh? Bet you didn't see THAT coming, eh, Reader?
The findings are likely to intensify the campaign by the family of the murdered veteran Tory MP that there should be a public inquiry into what the authorities knew about the dangers posed by Amess’s killer, and whether he could have been stopped. The government has so far resisted that call.
Keep pushing. Starmer will crack in the end!
The Amess family want an inquiry similar to that into the Southport atrocity, which started hearings this week.
One has to ask why the establishment wouldn’t want one, when it concerns the murder of one of their own?
As well as those driven to violence by such an ideology, police and the government are concerned about young men consuming a “pick and mix” of horror online and showing levels of interest in violence considered to be worrying.Any new anti-violence scheme would be in addition to Prevent and possibly even include it as a specific element to deal with those where ideology, such as Islamist or far right, is present. Multiple sources told the Guardian that while a new anti-violence scheme may be needed, a lack of money may thwart its setting-up.
Well, maybe they should have thought about this before splashing out on a superinjunction and the importation of thousands of Afghans.
4 comments:
Far Right investigations by Prevent are there to give a veneer that not all terrorism is by Mohammadans.
Jean Charles de Menezes? Who? Don't know why he was deliberately shot multiple times. Never mind. PO wrong C. Not of establishment. Nothing to see here.
It's not working.
Spot on!
Post a Comment