A couple who tried to cover up their baby's death by staging the discovery of her body on a bus in east London have had their sentences cut.
Please don't tell me it's because they thought this crime wasn't so bad? Or because the two subhumans have 'shown remorse'?
Announcing the decision, Mr Justice Jay said: "This is a case with numerous aggravating features. Imani was defenceless and extremely vulnerable.
"Both appellants were in a position of trust towards her which they grossly abused."
A pre-sentence report on Wiltshire "stated that he was continuing to distance himself entirely from any culpability", while a report on Baker, said the judge, "stated that she minimised her responsibility for the offence and placed most of the blame on Wiltshire".
Then....why?
In the court's judgement, the sentencing judge "gave insufficient weight to his finding that this was a case of constructive knowledge, albeit one which... was at the upper end of the spectrum of gravity applicable to such cases".
Mr Justice Jay added: "We are accordingly persuaded that the sentences he imposed were manifestly excessive."
WTAF?
5 comments:
They don't have to waste prison space on them if they were both compulsorily sterilised. They are turds in the gene pool.
Why didn't the original trial for murder fall under 'joint venture'? How can the murder of a baby be 'gotten away' with simply by both, one assumes, blaming the other?
Following a trial at the Old Bailey earlier this year they were acquitted of murder, but convicted of causing or allowing the death of 16-week-old Imani......... Even though the jury could not be sure who was responsible
On what fucking Multi-culti planet is an 11 year stretch for the causing the death of a baby is 'manifestly excessive' ?!?!?
Prison is not a safe place for child killers, apparently. If they suffer only half as much as that poor baby, I'll consider that justice has been served. Sod the courts...
:o/
If only we plebeians had some direct recourse in the case of out-of-touch/incompetent judiciary (seemingly 95% of them).
Dr. Guillotin's whimsical little device, perhaps? Pour encourager les autres, n'est-ce pas?
"They are turds in the gene pool."
Spot on.
"On what fucking Multi-culti planet is an 11 year stretch for the causing the death of a baby is 'manifestly excessive' ?!?!? "
One wonders, indeed.
"If only we plebeians had some direct recourse in the case of out-of-touch/incompetent judiciary (seemingly 95% of them)."
That estimate seems on the low side...
Post a Comment