This being 2025, of course, even the cringing apology has to have a 'trigger warning', least the word 'No' should cause a cock en froque to have a fit of the vapours:
Friday, 5 December 2025
More In Sorrow Than In Anger...
That's the statements put out as two rogue institutions are brought to heel by the victory in the Supreme Court and, no doubt, the urgings of their paid legal firms that if they continue drinking the trans Kool-Aide, they are laying themselves open to expensive lawsuits:
The 'members of our community upset by it' can just pull on their big boy panties and go back to the gents...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Whole thing's a nightmare this Tavistock freak show.
I was under the impression that any organisation was free to establish their own entry criteria. This ruling seems to be a blatant example of overreach. If the WI want to admit man in dresses I don't see that it is any one's business but their own. The Guides are a little different as there are minors involved and I can see an obvious ruse that teenaged boys could pull so that they can go camping with lots of girls.
Stonyground.
The 'members of our community upset by it' are the members of that community that should never have been in that community in the first place. It goes double for the Girl Guides.
Steven
B,b, but girls (real) can join the Scouts. A few years ago our wee scout group had to install a ladies toilet in our Scout hall, for that very reason.
Our church Womens' Guild in now just The Guild for similar reasons.
It shows no sign of ending...
If the WI do that, they risk losing all the real women.
Spot on
Yes, that's just as wrong, in my opinion. Everyone should have a right to a single sex space.
Post a Comment