...that seems to be David Lamentable's real goal:
Childhood criminal records could be wiped under plans being considered by David Lammy. The Justice Secretary is considering simplifying the current system to prevent people from being affected by petty crimes in later life. It comes after evidence showed that people in their 50s, 60s, and 70s still had offences of street fighting and bike thefts in their youth disclosed to employers.
So not content with plans to ensure the safeguard of a jury of your peers isn't available to you in the future, he wants to ensure that employers can't avoid hiring people they wouldn't hire if they knew their background?
Rachel de Souza, the Children's Commissioner, previously said judges should have the power to wipe criminal records of people who had 'done their time' for silly crimes committed as a child. Last year a 13-year-old girl admitted to threatening violent behaviour after she kicked a glass door at an asylum hotel. The offence will stay on her record for life and will be disclosed if she works in a job with children.
As it should be, no doubt. In modern Britain, being less than welcoming of the new Predator Classes is the greatest crime of all, isn't it? So much so that the filth will hunt YOU down if you object too strongly:.
so basically what I’m gathering from this is that a brown guy was harassing three women, they lashed out because they wanted him to go away, and now they’re being hunted by the police for doing a racism because they wouldn’t let the brown guy harass them endlessly pic.twitter.com/2t1kOcv0vC
— pagliacci the grinch 🎄🎁 (@Slatzism) December 11, 2025
5 comments:
Is there no ending to the !ironic actions of Lammy and the rest of the Labour Party. At the same time that they want to cancel criminal records of child offenders, they are lambasting Nigel Garage for something he may or may not, have done or said when he was 13. How old was John Venables and Robert Thompson when they tortured and murdered 5 years old Jamie Bulger? Lammy would have had their criminal record expunged on attaining 18 years of age. They could then have gone to possibly work in child care, or even become prominent members of the Labour Party. I've dealt with criminal recidivists who were under the age of 16, some of whom showed no emotions during their actions, being arrested, questioned, charged, or sentenced. To think that they would have had a clean character when 18 fills me with horror.
Penseivat
I don't think I'd have a problem with childhood records being sealed for petty crimes only, but it would need to be on the understanding that those records would be opened again for good, as soon as the person comits another crime as an adult
Do you then think it fair that a man in his 60s can be barred from being employed because he was convicted for a street brawl fifty years earlier, even though he has nothing against him since? Because that's the practical implication of what you are saying.
I wonder what the Artful Dodger grew up to be? We know that Oliver Twist made good, but that was through rich family connections - probably went into politics where his early training in thievery set him up nicely.
My sister knows one of the lasses in Leeds. They were defending themselves from one the enrichment brigade...
Post a Comment