As of Friday morning the ECB’s comprehensive 82-page report into all of this is now upon us, complete with the verdicts on charges against seven well-known Yorkshire cricketing figures. At the end of which it will be tempting to conclude that there are no winners in this; or perhaps that only Vaughan emerges with any credit, successfully cleared of a single charge of having referred to four players of South Asian origins by referring to them as “you lot” in the famous huddle.
But the truth is the ECB’s judgment is a victory for Rafiq.
Eh..? How on earth do you reach that conclusion? It's been a complete loss for race-baiters, hasn't it?
As usual...
...the fact is nobody can doubt Rafiq’s testimony now. For all the pain, embarrassment, and abuse, the viciousness of having his character dissected in public, the key point of all this has been upheld. And Rafiq has only ever had one point to make, that Yorkshire CCC’s institutional racism had damaged careers and lives, and that those concerns had been glossed over both by the county and initially by the ECB on Tom Harrison’s watch.
Ah, yes, Rafiq's character. Well, he's only got himself to blame for all that, hasn't he?
... it is now a mater (sic) of public record that Rafiq was routinely referred to as “Kaffir” and Ismail Dawood as “Token Black Man”. It was found that Bresnan called Rafiq’s sister “a fit Paki”. It was found that John Blain used the P-word. More usefully we know that there was and still is a massive cross-purpose misunderstanding of what racism is, and that, for example, Matthew Hoggard genuinely believes Matthew Hoggard is best equipped to decide this matter.
There certainly seems to be a big blind spot with regards to racism, when it's only one race that's ever deemed guilty of it...
There are those who will now crow and celebrate Vaughan’s vindication, while also pointing to the less admirable qualities of Rafiq dragged across the stage for the crime of daring to speak out.
Well, imagine if he hadn't spoken out. We wouldn't know anything about his 'less admirable qualities', would we?
I expect that's white society's fault too.
3 comments:
All too true, plus note that we're supposed to regard it as self-evidently nutso that Matthew Hoggard thinks he's best placed to decide whether or not Matthew Hoggard is racist.
Huh?
Apparently even if you're not racist you're still racist. You're born with racism.
Is that you, St Paul?
To a Yorkshireman, everyone else is an untermensch, worthy only of racial insults.
Penseivat
"Apparently even if you're not racist you're still racist. You're born with racism."
Only if you're white!
"To a Yorkshireman, everyone else is an untermensch, worthy only of racial insults."
🤣
Post a Comment