...the message being 'there can be no consequences whatsoever for this behaviour' even when you're caught:
A teacher who was investigated by police for potentially grooming a young student by buying her clothes and giving her hundreds of pounds has avoided being banned from the profession. A misconduct hearing into Guy Hewett’s actions ruled that details of his actions being published online by the watchdog would be “sufficient” enough and “send a message about his behaviour”.
He's done this despite being warned, doesn't that make him more of a risk?
It was also revealed Mr Hewett’s actions took place despite him receiving a written warning from the school not to contact any students by email, message or social media.
As a result, Mr Hewett was arrested by police, which led to a disciplinary hearing by the school a month later.
And the police investigation?
A week later the police concluded its investigation with no further action taken...
*sighs*
Mr Hewett’s health condition is mentioned in the report but redacted due to privacy reasons. It was suggested by the panel whatever this condition was, there was a “clear causal link” between his health and the behaviours demonstrated.
What sort of 'health condition' causes you to behave like this?
4 comments:
Something like a brain tumour has been found to be responsible for behavioural changes in other cases.
Being a paedophile?
@Matt
Muder. Google The Weinstein Case. Herbert Weinstein, not Harvey Weinstein.
"Something like a brain tumour has been found to be responsible for behavioural changes in other cases."
True, but I always wonder just how 'out of the blue' these cases really are.
"Being a paedophile?"
That's far more likely!
"Google The Weinstein Case. Herbert Weinstein, not Harvey Weinstein."
Such a rare case, though.
Post a Comment