Saturday, 11 July 2015

When Speaking The Uncomfortable Truth Makes You A ‘Bigot’…

…even if you’re the same race as those you are criticising:
A British-Asian peer has been accused of bigotry after she claimed that marriages between first cousins in Pakistani communities were leading to “absolutely appalling” disabilities among children.
Indisputably so. She’s not the only peer to have ever raised this, either.
Lady Flather, the first female Asian peer, told the Lords during a debate on ethnic minorities: “There are a lot of first-cousin marriages in certain communities, particularly among Pakistanis who come from the Pakistani Kashmir area.
“We know so much about DNA now, but there is so much disability among the children, which is absolutely appalling. You go to any such family and there will be four or five children, at least one or two of whom will have some disability. That is absolutely unacceptable, and if we cannot do anything about it, is it fair to the children?
And usually, a cry of ‘We must think of the chiiiildreeen!’ would resonate with everyone. Or so you’d think:
The 81-year-old peer, who was born in the Pakistani city of Lahore when it was still part of India, said: “Never mind the parents – it is not fair to the children that they should be allowed to become disabled because of a social practice.
“It is a social practice which does not belong in today’s age, when we know so much about DNA. There should at least be some rule which says that you must have a DNA examination before your marriage can be registered.”
But this sensible approach was immediately torpedoed by the usual suspects. First up, a ‘conservative’ that clearly was desperate to prove his credentials as one of Cameron’s pets:
The baroness was rebuked by the Conservative peer, Lord Sheikh, who said parts of her speech were “unfair and irrelevant” and “will not help community cohesion in this country” .
Will willful blindness help with community cohesion, then? Or shocking, avoidable deformity?
The Muslim Council of Britain said she had “a bee in her bonnet about British Muslims generally and those of Asian heritage in particular”.
It said: “Her consistent bigotry has unfortunately forfeited the right to be taken seriously.”
Hey, MCB, if ‘consistent bigotry’ is sufficient to disqualify someone from being taken seriously, why on earth is anyone still listening to you..?

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ahh, all those lovely nice moderate moss-slems.

Greencoat said...

So 'The Muslim Council of Britain' - decides who has the right to be taken seriously? Now that's what I called Chutzpah!

Mike Kemble said...

I have been called a bigot many times by hard left whingers who refuse to ack the fact that I can have an opinion, whilst being on the other side of the fence. No, I am not right wing, just not idiot left.

Bigot is a person who refuses to allow others an opinion whilst spouting their own version, the left whingers are full of it. When an immigrant of any source goes to a country, they are EXPECTED to follow that country's law and justice system, abide by that country's customs and allow, without contradiction, their beliefs.

It workd every where like australia, but slipping fast. Saudi Arabia and many others. So, why not the UK? Our politicans and lawmen are cowards, thats why.

Lynne at Counting Cats said...

Inbred says as inbred does.

JuliaM said...

"Now that's what I called Chutzpah!"

Quite!

"When an immigrant of any source goes to a country, they are EXPECTED to follow that country's law and justice system, abide by that country's customs and allow, without contradiction, their beliefs."

Only we in the West have the death wish that makes this optional...