In a statement, the school said of the newsletter, written by the LGBTQ+ student society, had the intention of 'communicating safety advice to young people who may be considering risky practices ... Interest and curiosity are not necessarily fixed to a specific age group.
'Information can safeguard children seeking answers to questions they may have that they cannot find safely in isolation.'
Think this is the only school where this happens?
3 comments:
"...Information can safeguard..."
Young children in their formative years are best safeguarded by not having LGBTQWERTY agitprop thrust at their immature and (hopefully) developing minds.
Why are these advocates of "Huxley meets Orwell" given such positions?
Breast binding is dangerous. It should not be being promoted in schools not even by deluded sixth formers. The pushing of trans ideology in schools is turning into an utter tragedy, especially among teenage girls. This is a cohort who are known to have body image issues at a much greater number than other groups and instead of encouraging these girls, who are often going through a period of mental fragility, to love who they are, the schools, the trans activists and other related groups are telling them to hate their own bodies and to mutilate them.
"Why are these advocates of "Huxley meets Orwell" given such positions?"
They did have a very, very long march to get there...
"Breast binding is dangerous. It should not be being promoted in schools not even by deluded sixth formers. "
These same 'educators' are no doubt also happy to condemn pro-anorexia websites, without the slightest sense of shame.
Post a Comment