Eight men have been remanded in custody over allegations of grooming and committing sexual activity with teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester.The names are a litany of...well, you can imagine. And that's not all:
Meanwhile, three men aged between 34 and 43 answered bail on Tuesday and were re-bailed to later dates.I look forward to 22 June, and the contortions of the 'Guardian' and 'Indy'...
A further five men are due to answer bail on 21 June 2011.
Five other men have been released without charge while three more are not on bail.
Police said one man had been handed over to the UK Border Agency.
H/T: Surreptitious Evil via email
14 comments:
You can begin to see why the 'slim cult seeks to help keep their men under control by putting women in bags and hiding their faces.
It also shows why young non-'slim women should politely and carefully 'walk on the other side of the road' to avoid getting caught up in their lust games.
In other words, steer well clear, ladies. We may be required by multi-culti law (though the 'slims appear not to be so restrained) and nagged by the incessant whining of the libtards to not say anything unpleasant to them but, on reflection, best to stay out of chatting-up distance.
No contortions required at the BBC, of course.
They simply won't report it.
Handing the paedo sacks of pigs offal over to the Border Agency is not good enough. Hand them over to the girls' parents first.
Its not religion, religion is a construct of culture and culture is a construct of race.
What is happening cannot be changed by conversion to Christianity, only separation of the races, geographical separation, will allow us to live our lives as we wish.
Uncle Badger: 'No contortions required at the BBC, of course.
They simply won't report it.'
Dead right.
In matters like this, the BBC is as silent as a Trappist monk.
"paedo sacks"-Lynne
No they aren't. The girls are described as 'teenagers'...which is probably an euphemism for '14 year old white-trash tramp-stamped Jailbait practicing for single motherhood'.
edit* that should have read 'a euphemism' I think.
"This Is Getting Harder And Harder To Sweep Under The Carpet..."
There can be no whitewash at the shiitehouse.
Whilst I am as happy as anyone else to engage in BBC bashing I feel compelled to point out that Julia's source in this matter is... the BBC.
This has been bubbling under the surface in the Midlands since at least 2004.
The fat is well and truly in the fire now, I would not be surprised if the same sort of thing has been happening in other parts of the country. The question is, has the extent of the problem been covered up for the sake of multiculturalism
It would be interesting to see collated figures on this form of child abuse. It's found all over (academic papers) - but only the puerile would see this as making it 'non-cultural'. Some of the histories of it in white society are entirely cringeworthy, as is current 'sex tourism'. Emily Pankhurst made comments on it from her role in a registry office.
Many societies exploit their young and women in ways we don't want.
This is not a Muslim issue even if 9 in 10 men involved are (I don't know the actual figure). Moat was up to it if you remember. However, we have decided against it, it's law, and it remains 'OK' in a wider section of Muslims in the UK than it should. Stamping time is long overdue. In 1743 you could marry at 14 (12 for the girl) in the UK. This time would seem appropriate as a place to send these vile men.
"Whilst I am as happy as anyone else to engage in BBC bashing I feel compelled to point out that Julia's source in this matter is... the BBC."
True enough, but I didn't find it - it was sent to me.
It should have been on the main news page - such a big case - but it wasn't. It was buried away in local news, that I rarely bother browsing...
"The question is, has the extent of the problem been covered up for the sake of multiculturalism"
I think the answer has to be 'Yes'.
"It's found all over (academic papers) - but only the puerile would see this as making it 'non-cultural'."
Indeed.
"In 1743 you could marry at 14 (12 for the girl) in the UK. This time would seem appropriate as a place to send these vile men."
They seem eager to return there themselves, don't they?
I still can't understand why my countrymen tolerate these hostile aliens in the first place.
"In 1743 you could marry at 14 (12 for the girl) in the UK. This time would seem appropriate as a place to send these vile men."
They seem eager to return there themselves, don't they?
Knock the '1' off the front of that date and you might be in the ballpark.
Post a Comment