Saturday, 22 September 2018

"People, don't you understand, the child needs a helping hand, or he'll grow to be an angry young man some day?"

A tale of two deprived young black boys:
Today, David, 25, is a successful, eloquent civil servant. A private secretary in a government department, he holds a law degree and a masters in legal and political theory from University College London.
His friend Stephen Lansana, meanwhile, is serving life for murder at HMP Whitemoor, a Category A prison in Cambridgeshire. He will be in his 50s before he will be even considered for release.
As teenagers, they were no different, except in one very important respect — the opportunities afforded to them.
David, you see, was given a scholarship to Rugby. So, is that the answer?
This week, London Mayor Sadiq Khan announced plans for a Violence Reduction Unit. Violent crime, he said, should be treated as a public health problem — a 'disease infecting communities' — requiring action to tackle the root causes.
But what are those 'root causes'? Is it simply lack of money? What does David say he noticed most at Rugby?

"But most poignant to me was the presence of both parents actively taking an interest in the education of their children."
David is still involved with EYLA, mentoring youngsters.
'I'm not sure what the long-term solution is, but what I see in my community is lack of aspiration and a here-and-now mentality.
'Young people tend to make their decisions in view of the short-term, quick gain, easy routes,' he says.
Since we can't retrospectively travel back in time and somehow ensure two parents stay together to raise a child, what can Khan do?

It's way too late to tackle the Loxodonta africana in the room...

3 comments:

jack ketch said...

except in one very important respect — the opportunities afforded to them.
David, you see, was given a scholarship to Rugby


and his mate had to go to the local A Level College, quelle horreur!
Now I may have left the local 6th form with an A level in liver cirrhosis, a 60 a day habit, various STDs and nothing else but that was my choice, my decision(s). Others in my classes are now running the bloody country. Were they any brighter than me ? Nope not all of them, some of them only barely scraped through into Polytechs or, even worse, 'teacher training'. Some of them came from better backgrounds then me, others less so. The most intelligent, genius level intelligent, kid in my class was from a really good home with money and influence but the last time I met her, she was living in a council flat, unemployed and unemployable ...and get this: she went to a very good public school before college, what oh!

Ted Treen said...

"...'But when I observed the benefit that a good father contributes to the home fortunate enough to have one, I realised that I perhaps did miss out on something..." (from The Mail)

'Good' being the operative word.

JuliaM said...

"The most intelligent, genius level intelligent, kid in my class was from a really good home with money and influence but the last time I met her, she was living in a council flat, unemployed and unemployable ...and get this: she went to a very good public school before college, what oh!"

There's always a certain element of chance, yes. There always will be in a system where the subject has free will.

But the overall figures speak for themselves.

"'Good' being the operative word."

Oh, yes, point taken.