A judge has launched a stinging attack on a drunken Wren who cried rape after claiming she woke up to find she was having sex with the wrong man.Uh oh….
Judge Jeff Blackett blamed the woman for drinking heavily, being an ‘enthusiastic participant’ in sex and said she did not come to court with ‘clean hands’.Oh, boy!
But in his withering judgment, he did not criticise those who brought the case because ‘we live in an atmosphere and era that makes it very difficult for the police and prosecuting authorities not to prosecute allegations of this nature’.And they should therefore be free from any criticism?
Good job we didn’t have this guy at Nuremburg, eh?
Judge Blackett said: ‘A woman who drinks to excess and returns voluntarily with two men, having sex with one man while the other is in the room, does not come to court with entirely clean hands.
‘This is the sort of case which in my opinion should never have come to court. There cannot be any higher consent to sex than enthusiastic participation in it. She responded for a few minutes to the defendant’s sexual advances. She felt him kissing her neck, kissed him on the lips and then allowed full sexual intercourse to take place.
‘If the defendant genuinely believed she consented, even though that belief may have been mistaken, he is not guilty of rape.It’s a bit harsh to criticise the service. What did they do, other than employ these people?
‘She said she blames herself and she must share that responsibility. None of this has brought any credit to the service and all three rates have let themselves and their service down.’
But wait a minute. Wasn’t this trial a few weeks ago? Why are we only hearing about this now?
His comments were made two weeks ago when Dinnell’s legal team applied to have the case dropped due to lack of evidence, but they can only be reported now for legal reasons.Very interesting…