Monday, 17 September 2012

Why Do They Always Think Their Sob Story Will Be Accepted By The Public?

Six weeks ago, Katherine, who had been living with her parents in Wentworth Way, Sanderstead, presented herself as homeless after falling out with her father. …
I wonder what the falling out was about?
Katherine and Jamie were moved to emergency housing in Fitzroy Court, a house of multiple occupancy (HMO) in Crystal Palace.
‘Emergency’ there meaning temporary. While she awaited a council house.
Katherine, 27, was told she and her baby son Jamie were being moved – but not to Croydon. Instead, the young mum and her 11-month-old child were being packed off to a hotel in Feltham, 20 miles away on the other side of London.
OK, Feltham's no paradise, but compared with Croydon? I'd have thought it was no contest?
When Katherine refused to move because her new home would be too far from her family, the former nursery worker received another letter.
"I am writing to inform you that the council will no longer provide accommodation for you," it said, before citing the Housing Act 1996.
For refusing to move away from Croydon, the council had discharged its responsibility to put a roof over Katherine's head.
Beggars, you see, can't be choosers. If you are dependent on the largesse of the State, you go where the State chooses to put you, or forgo such largesse...
"It was made clear that if I refused to move then I wouldn't have any more help from them.
"What sort of choice is that? " she said.
The only choice you deserve - Hobsons!
"I was in tears. It was so far away. I don't know anyone in Feltham. I would have been scared to be there with just my baby. I felt like I was being pushed away from my family.
"I'd moved out of the house in Crystal Palace because they told me to. All my stuff was in bags and I was told it was Feltham or nothing."
This is the family you've supposedly fallen out with, right? I mean, it helps if you can keep your story straight, I find...
Having rejected the move, Katherine had little choice but to return to her parents' house and back into the situation she had tried to escape.
Gosh! Life with Daddy was better than Feltham after all...
Alison Butler, Labour's local spokesman for housing, said: "Croydon has a crisis in terms of the number of people in emergency accommodation but this is against the assurances the council has given that no one will be forced to move away.
"Telling a single mum with a baby to pack her bags before she comes to the meeting had already narrowed her options. But refusing to help if she turned the offer down gave her no choice.
"It's an unacceptable situation and I am deeply concerned that people are being pressured into moving out of Croydon against their will."
Well, you put her up then!

There's not a great deal of sympathy in the comments, and this one sums up why:
in_Despair_01
“Wow these stories make me so angry! You should not be ENTITLED to housing because you have fallen out with a parent (if that is true) and what could be so bad after living at home for 27 years could force you to want to move out now. And why can she not Privately rent and get the Housing people to pay it? Surely if she's a single Mum she would be entitled to some kind of Housing Benefit? I think the whole system needs to be completely changed, really there is no such thing as Council housing as it was intended when created for working class families. Why do these people keep highlighting their stories to the press in the hope of shaming the Council to house them. She should be totally ashamed of herself for thinking she deserves something for doing absolutely nothing but have a child and a row with her Dad.”
Amen!

11 comments:

Macheath said...

I'm reminded of the 2007 Top Gear special; Jeremy Clarkson, after visiting New Orleans, promised to donate the second-hand car he was using to a community project when filming was done, only to be threatened with legal action afterwards because the car, described as a 1991 model, was actually made in 1989.

The lawyer representing the Christian Mission (no, really!) said she would drop the case in exchange for $20,000. The involvement of Labour's spokesman suggest the capital here is more of a political nature - I suspect things are about to start heating up for IDS.

LivingtheDream said...

Back in the bosom of her family then.
I lurve a happy ending.

One of the less PC commentators helpfully highlights what's really keeping Croydon's burgermeisters awake at nights :

http://www.croydon.gov.uk/housing/residents/spanels/emag

Anonymous said...

She doesn't deserve the steam wafting from my urine.

>Alison Butler, Labour's local spokesman for housing, said blah blah blah blah unacceptable blah blah concerned blah blah
I'll get you, Butler!


Tatty said...

Living The Dream - I followed your link and received enlightenment.

For a very long time I've been under the impression mass immigration of ethnic minorities created employment for those tasked and paidto deal with their "problems".

Now I see that the mass immigration of ethnic minorities has actually instead created employment for those tasked with finding other people to deal with their "problems" for free.

Live and learn, eh.

Woman on a Raft said...

In some ways, Katherine was lucky. The council has considered towns in Yorkshire

Since they don't mention which part of Yorkshire I'm unable to advise if she's been luck or if Yorkshire has.

Anyway, why is she a former nursery worker? Nursery work is ideally suited to combining with looking after your own child. I know of day nannies who do exactly this.

David Gillies said...

Housing benefit is a landlords' ramp, anyway. I never got it when I lived in the UK and I was absolutely boracic. Wouldn't have thought to ask for it, either. It's hardly as if stopping subsidising feckless little cows like this would have them starving in the streets either. Sell off all council housing, stop paying people to live in places they can't afford, and take planning power away from Town Halls, and the situation would be right as ninepence in no time flat.

banned said...

Some while back a housing officer told me, off the record, that new rules enabling them to offer rehousing anywhere in the county rather than just in the claimants home town would be used to deal with people playing the system which is exactly what seems to have happened here.

JuliaM said...

"The involvement of Labour's spokesman suggest the capital here is more of a political nature - I suspect things are about to start heating up for IDS."

Oh, yes! The Beeb was carrying water for them last night with a piece on the local news about 'the spectre of homelessness'.

"One of the less PC commentators helpfully highlights what's really keeping Croydon's burgermeisters awake at nights"

Good old Tim Nash, eh? I wonder where he lives?

"Since they don't mention which part of Yorkshire I'm unable to advise if she's been luck or if Yorkshire has."

Heh!

"...which is exactly what seems to have happened here."

Given she's back being her parents' problem, I'd say so too.

Furor Teutonicus said...

XX Feltham or ......"XX die.

Now let me think hard about this....

Bucko said...

I wonder how many other people would simply pack up and go home if housing benefit was taken away. I think it's worth an experiment

Anonymous said...

"Bucko said...

I wonder how many other people would simply pack up and go home if housing benefit was taken away. I think it's worth an experiment"
So do I.

Why was she even offered a house in London at all?
As she is obviously unemployable somewhere where there is not a housing shortage for people who work would be a better idea.