Saturday, 10 November 2012

If It’s ‘For The Chiiiiillldreeeen!’ How Can You Say It’s Gone Wrong?

Suzanne Moore weighs in on the Savile scandal.

And she finds the concentration on the ‘celebrity’ aspect of it all very unhelpful to her agenda:
The recognition of abuse has been seen as a leftie/liberal delusion. Safeguarding and CRB checks have indeed been cack-handed and intrusive but it is important to remember they were born from a wish to protect children.
So…if they sprang from righteous intentions, we can’t criticise how they were used? Really?
The focus on Savile has triggered many to now tell their truths and, if we can bear to listen, it is heartwrenchingly apparent that, unlike Savile, many of these men who abused children are the most ordinary of monsters.
We don't need an inquiry to tell us this, or that "care" is often not care at all. We need, instead, the political will to provide the resources to look after our most vulnerable children properly and to prosecute those who rape them. Only then will we have "moved on" from where were 20 years ago.
So you see, it’s simple.

All we have to do is simply accept what these ‘victims’ are telling us, without question, avoiding all doubt over discrepancies in their stories, and all will be well.

C’mon, who doesn't think that’ll make things so much better for the future?

4 comments:

The Meissen Bison said...

The focus on Savile has triggered many to now tell their truths...

...which are not always consonant with the facts but which are merrily broadcast by the unspeakably awful and sloppy BBC.

On the subject of sloppy, that's a split infinitive from a sanctimonious columnist.

Dr Cromarty said...

Would it be unreasonable to send an anonymous tip to the cops that famous Guardian journalist Suzanne Moore was a paedo. Or maybe start a conspiracy website naming her as head of a Guardian-based paedo ring?

I mean, she COULD be. She looks a bit odd.

After all, it's for the cheeeeeeeeldren. Who could object?

John Pickworth said...

Yeah, that Suzanne had me in the back of her Nissan Micra and touched my boy parts. I knew it was her because she smelt of nail varnish and cigar smoke.

JuliaM said...

"On the subject of sloppy, that's a split infinitive from a sanctimonious columnist."

Grating, isn't it?

And this whole sorry saga has now claimed a big scalp - the DG of the Beeb has been forced out!

"I mean, she COULD be. She looks a bit odd."

Indeed! But these people never, ever expect to be hoist on their own petard, do they?

"I knew it was her because she smelt of nail varnish and cigar smoke."

:D