Evans has the legal right to take his arguments that the trial was unfair – the website pleads repeatedly that footballers are victimised by the media – to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which he has.
The website, though, is unrelentingly hostile to the girl who is established in law to have been his victim. It sullies her in several different, pernicious and manipulative ways.The Guardian's attitude seems to be 'Your mob is awful but our mob is righteous'.
And when you have the 'Daily Mail', of all papers, arguing you've gone too far in pursuit of a criminal, you might want to pause and reflect on how your life has turned out...
3 comments:
Gosh. Here I am, doubling your comment tally for today's trio of topics, Julia. But it's the least I can do for anyone prepared to parade their utter insignificance to the rest of humanity.
The thrust of the Grauniad article seems to be that the FA need to legislate against sex criminals. That's all well and good, what happens if they next legislate against warble gloamist deniers, where does it end?
"Gosh. Here I am, doubling your comment tally for today's trio of topics, Julia."
*Apu voice* 'Thank you, come again!'
"...seems to be that the FA need to legislate against sex criminals."
The progressives need to include that profession on the list of those barring sex offenders, then. Not seek to have the mob do it, extra-legally.
Post a Comment