Monday 13 August 2012

Hate Speech The Disability Activists Don’t Disapprove Of…

Laurence Clark on David Cameron:
I think I need to begin this blog by clarifying my use of the word ‘hate’ as I don’t use it lightly. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as having an intense dislike or strong aversion towards someone, which pretty much actually summarises my feelings towards David Cameron.
How tolerant of others’ views you are, Laurence!
Furthermore, I cannot think of another human being that I would apply this word to.
Really? Not one single human being on the planet?
Sure, there are certainly tyrants and evil dictators around in the world today, but none of them have the negative impact on people like me that Dave has.
Ah. I see. It’s all about YOU…
Way before the election hype and the unholy partnership of the Coalition Government, the writing was already on the wall for us disabled people. Some naïve people initially assumed that, as someone who had a disabled son, we should expect some empathy and support from Dave.
‘He was supposed to be one of us! He was supposed to give us special privileges!’
…it was at the beginning of this year that Dave showed his true colours and revealed the disdain with which he regards us disabled people, by describing Commons heckling by Ed Balls as like “having someone with Tourette’s sitting opposite you“. This disgusting behaviour from the leader of our country confirmed the worst suspicions of millions of disabled people.
Those millions for whom Laurence feels entitled to speak, because he just knows that they all think and feel the same way as himself. They must do..!

And if you’re thinking that this sounds an awful lot like the stuff the race activists churn out, well, it seems there’s one more point of similarity:
A couple of weeks ago Harriet Harman said that Conservatives cannot be feminists. I’d go one further and argue that disabled people cannot be Conservatives.
Ah. Yes, since they clearly are, they must be whatever the equivalent of an 'Uncle Tom' is...

9 comments:

Oldrightie said...

I have linked to this on mine, today, thank you.

Anonymous said...

So HATE is ok.....as long as it is not based on a minority issue?

If we can have religiously motivated hate, then why not politically motivated hate?

In which case, Laurence, you are guilty of polictically motivated hate crime. 28 days in prison....off you go.

DJ said...

Note the double-dipping too. He's all about 'inclusion' but not if it includes having to work for a living. They're just like everyone else, but they need youre cash.

As ever, they're all about the independence, provided you define 'independent' as living off everyone else's hard-earned.

Anonymous said...

Sparty bloke is right about one thing :

"Dave ...revealed the disdain...by describing Commons heckling by Ed Balls as like “having someone with Tourette’s sitting opposite you“."

Very unkind to compare people with Tourette's to the awfulness that is Ed Balls.

David Gillies said...

This guy obviously feels the need to stand up against the evil Tories. Oh sorry, he can't.

Ancient+Tattered Airman said...

And we all know how even-handed and unbiaed the Independent is, don't we?
I wonder whether the trades description act could used to help cleanse this Marxist rabble?

Noggin the Nog said...

Why would anyone want to be a feminist?

I just see the word as synonymous with lesbian, or muppet.

JuliaM said...

"I have linked to this on mine, today, thank you."

Cheers! :)

"If we can have religiously motivated hate, then why not politically motivated hate?"

Well, indeed! No more 'Guardian'...

"As ever, they're all about the independence, provided you define 'independent' as living off everyone else's hard-earned."

Spot on!

JuliaM said...

"This guy obviously feels the need to stand up against the evil Tories. Oh sorry, he can't."

Heh!