Thursday 2 August 2012

Oh, Look! It’s The Return Of The ‘Let’s Teach Kiddies The Roads Are Playgrounds’ Brigade!

When a section of Old Shoreham Road was closed for several months earlier this year for the construction of cycle lanes, it turned into a traffic-free playground for children.
Boys and girls zoomed about on skateboards and practised their wheelies on bikes in complete freedom from the fear of four-wheeled monsters.
With the work now completed, it is back to normal – the children have run off the road as traffic once again takes precedence.
Well, yes, of course it ‘takes precedence’. It’s a road….

So let’s hope the kiddiewinks understand that now it’s no longer closed, it’s not as safe, eh?
But it gave a glimpse of how cities should be: a proper balance between the need of children to play and the need for traffic to flow.
We do understand the balance between ‘the needs of children to play and the need for traffic to flow’ perfectly well.

That’s why cars are confined to roads, and people to pavements and parks. It’s not rocket science.
One Brighton grandparent, Clive William, brought my attention to the city of Bristol, where a group of mothers has activated a scheme called Playing Out.
Three years ago, they persuaded Bristol City Council to issue Temporary Play Street Orders, whereby residents were granted permission to close their street to traffic for three hours, thus enabling their children to play out.
Which this Mensa-candidate thinks is a splendid idea, of course…

*rolls eyes*

Of course, if you don’t have children, I guess you can’t submit a contra-petition to keep the kiddiewinks off the road so you can use it yourself? No, no. All must bow to the Whim of the Fecund!
I cannot see why residential roads should not be closed for several hours on Saturdays and Sundays, particularly on Sundays, the quietest day of the week, and in the summer months, from 7pm to 9pm.
Not only would it fit in with the ideals of the council’s ruling Green Party, but it is also the ideal solution to the problem many parents have: tiny city gardens too small for children to play in.
I can see many, many reasons, namely that I don’t have kids and I might want to use the road I pay tax for! 

And if you have a ‘tiny city garden too small to play in’ then either:

a) don’t breed, or 
b) take your spawn to the local park. 


Oh, wait. Brighton, eh? That rings a bell
Instead, they must take them to a park at least once a day for at least an hour, taking at least a couple of hours out of a day when you factor in getting to and from the park, packing all the gear you need, and the time it takes to get young children into their shoes and coats. This alone is stressful, and especially so in winter or when it's raining, which makes sitting in a park an unpleasant experience for mothers.
When it becomes a daily necessity, it renders it a chore, and then at weekends many parents feel obliged to take their children to a specific activity, such as an open farm, which, lovely though they are, cost money.
Oh, it’s so tiresome when you have to do things with your spawn, isn’t it? Much easier just to offload them out onto the street.

Seriously, who could begrudge you the chance to upset everyone else’s lifestyle to cater for yours?
The Argus recently reported that many children in city estates have never visited the seafront less than half a mile away.
But it’s no wonder: if parents who live in Whitehawk have limited means, they cannot afford to take them to the seafront, which is like going on holiday because it has the fairground rides, the ice creams, the seafront shops, the pier.
If you can’t afford kids, don’t have them. End of.

The ‘Guardian’ gets in on this barmy idea too, and you’ll never believe whose fault it is that it’s not more popular….
Play streets were one of the first intellectual imports from America – they flourished here from the 30s until Margaret Thatcher caved into the motorists' lobby.
/facepalm

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Blame Thatcher - it's the leftie version of Godwin's law: Eventually any Guardianista argument will boil down to "it's all Margaret Thatcher's fault" Perhaps we could call it the Crun Corollary?

DJ said...

I'm just surprised there's any members of the breeding classes still living in Eltonograd.

SadButMadLad said...

Just let the kids play on the street. Or on the pavement. Or in the garden. Or in the park. Kids are very good at finding things to do - if left to their own devices if not nannied and mollycuddled. You do not need to watch your kids like a hawk in the park, nor take a whole car full of gear for those "just in case" moments.

Woodsy42 said...

I wonder how sat-navs will cope?

Macheath said...

"...which makes sitting in a park an unpleasant experience for mothers"

How far down the road of selfishness have we gone when a mother can find watching her child play 'unpleasant' because the weather isn't perfect?

And if the children are adopting this me-first attitude, no wonder they (presumably) are 'obliging' their parents to take them to paying attractions at weekends.

Meanwhile, since most people don't, as a rule, drive their cars round urban streets purely for fun, the traffic displaced to allow the children to play must end up somewhere else; how do the residents there feel about it, I wonder.

microdave said...

I think temporary road closures sound like an excellent idea - just so long as they are applied only at school run times...

citychurches said...

Sorry, way off the mark. Play streets are a great idea. There's no reason pedestrians shouldn't have priority on residential roads. Leave it up to the local residents,

microdave said...

This isn't about pedestrians having priority - the streets in question were completely closed to traffic. If the residents want them converted into "play streets" so be it, but that doesn't give carte blanche to ban traffic from accessing roads they have already paid for 5 times over...

Noggin the Nog said...

Great idea, so long as I can drive my car through the children's playground when the roads are closed.

Anonymous said...

When I go to my accountants in one of Liverpool's less salubrious suburbs, the roads surrounding them are classified as play roads. This means that vehicles can still access them, but at certain times of the day the speed limit is 20mph and the driver is requested to keep an eye out for children. It works in the Liverpool, why not in Brighton, drive considerately knowing that there could be children in the street, end of.

But then that wouldn't get these idiots the oxygen publicity they crave. I personally think they can have all the publicity oxygen they want, as for real useful oxygen, not so much.

Bunny

ivan said...

Which this Mensa-candidate thinks is a splendid idea, of course…
Don't you mean Darwin Award candidate, or is this the level of comprehension and thought the general UK population has fallen to?

Pitch between the stones said...

When I was a kiddie (dear God, that was years ago) certain streets of Salford -- you know, Coronation Street land -- were closed at certain times of day and designated as play streets.

Not that we bothered too much: the streets were cobbled and there were precious few vehicles anywhere. Playing in the street was fine as no one round there could afford cars.

The point of this? Well, times change. What might have worked then doesn't so much now.

That is all, so get used to it and move on.

JuliaM said...

"I'm just surprised there's any members of the breeding classes still living in Eltonograd."

Heh! Me too...

"How far down the road of selfishness have we gone when a mother can find watching her child play 'unpleasant' because the weather isn't perfect?"

Too far, I fear, to ever turn back...

" Leave it up to the local residents,"

Sure thing. And...if the childless outvote the parents?

"Great idea, so long as I can drive my car through the children's playground when the roads are closed."

:D